Wednesday, 18 April 2018

Elevator pitch 2: 'But where are you REALLY from?'

Being asked 'where are you from?' is an exasperating experience for black musician Nura from the band SXTN. The rapper said that when she tells people she’s from Germany, they often press further by asking, “but where are you really from?”. Her experience is common all over the world and it persists despite endless programming to make us believe that holding a German passport makes you German. I'm reminded of that clownish Bishop of Dublin with his fatuous observation on Muslim Brotherhood 'activist' Ibrahim Halawa (this fine young Irishman is pictured here with his lovely sisters) to the effect that 'he's as Irish as any of us'.

It's vital that Whites clamp down on this insidious nonsense and it's possible to do so without being unduly "offencive" to normies. So here's my proposed elevator pitch* for use the next time you hear Mo Farah described as British or other such nonsense. It's important not to let it pass.
"But he's not Irish [or any other White nationality] because the Irish today have evolved over thousands of years, sharing territory, ethnicity, language, culture, religion, history, traditions, myths and legends which have fused to make us what we are today, which is in effect an extended tribe with unique characteristics and a strong sense of national identity. Being born here to African parents affords him none of that. It doesn't mean he's a worse person or anything, it just means he's not Irish. If I had been born in Japan would it not be understandable for people to ask me 'but where are you really from?' If he can be deemed Irish then the word has lost all meaning."

I think that's a powerful pitch. It can of course be modified - if the conversation continues! - to show that European peoples are merely an extended version of White nations. That is, we have more in common with one another than we ever will with those of different races.

*So-called because it represents the duration of a typical elevator ride in which you have to make your point to a prospect.

Saturday, 14 April 2018

Elevator pitch 1: Migrants

Much discussion has taken place here over the last few weeks on the most effective way to address the JQ. A strong majority (including me) recognises a full-frontal assault to be generally counter-productive, that most people have been programmed to tune out and/or rebel if fed too much too fast. Same applies in other areas of interest to White advocates. We must recognise that our opportunities to exert influence on normies in an interpersonal level is limited, particularly in relation to time. What we require therefore is a form of 'elevator pitch'* for each subject, something short and punchy that will, if not open up a deeper interaction, at least introduce an element of doubt in the other's mind. 

Here's my suggested elevator pitch for the migrant issue. (I'll suggest others over the coming weeks).

Normie: 'How can you be so cruel and uncharitable as to turn away those unfortunates 'fleeing war and poverty'?'

You: 'So are you saying that everyone who wants to come here should be accepted? Research from Oxford University shows that hundreds of millions of sub-Saharan Africans would migrate to Europe if they could. Are you suggesting that Europe's population be doubled within a few years?'

'Of course not. Therefore you have to agree that migration controls are necessary in principle. Which means we're talking about how we implement immigration controls rather than immigration controls per se. We're making progress!

'Here's another thing. If migrants seeking illegal entry knew with certainty that they'd be rejected and returned (i.e. the Australian Solution) the mass drownings would stop overnight. If you're sincere about preventing these drownings you'd support the Australian Solution too.'

*So-called because it represents the duration of a typical elevator ride in which you have to make your point to a prospect.

Wednesday, 11 April 2018

Stunning: Or is it?

It's long been my understanding that the Jewish Power over White countries has been applied by relatively subtle means. The Jew-behind-the-curtain stereotype has arisen for a reason. There have been exceptions of course, the early Soviet Union being an obvious example, the Bela Kun regime in Hungary another. But for the most part I would have thought that a juicy combination of financial inducements, favourable (((media))) coverage and blackmail would have done the trick. I remember reading that when Netanyahu first met with President Clinton he's supposed to have pointed out that some damaging material about him (Clinton) had fallen into Mossad hands...but not to worry 'it's safe with us'. 

I was therefore staggered to read the following in the Occidental Observer. Bear in mind that in political circles even very close associates of senior political figures will use their formal title in front of 'outsiders'. I have had many meetings with Government Ministers in Ireland, South Africa, Pakistan and the Middle East and they were always referred to as 'Minister' in my presence even when it was obvious they all were on personal terms with the others at the meetings. I'm talking about Ministers or even Under-Secretaries here, not Prime Ministers or Presidents. That puts in context the following staggering exchanges.
"Levy was described as “undoubtedly the notional head of British Jewry” by the Jerusalem Post. Two potential donors to New Labour, John and Courtney Coventry, described what happened when they met Levy and Blair:
“We were greeted by Jane Hogarth [a New Labour official] and taken to meet Lord Levy. He was like an animated cartoon, with large gestures and an overbearing personality. He discussed donations and how appreciative the party would be, especially Mr Blair. He said he would introduce us to ‘Tony’ and Jack Straw [the half-Jewish Home Secretary], Alastair Campbell [Blair’s thuggish spin-doctor] and various others. He said we would have plenty of time with Tony.” Then they [John and Courtney Coventry] witnessed an extraordinary exchange. Lord Levy was taking a call when the Prime Minister walked over to him and started to speak. Courtney said: “Lord Levy held up his hand and said, ‘Not now, Tony,’ and went back to his phone call. The Prime Minister turned to walk away and Lord Levy said, ‘Tony, wait, I need to speak to you.’
“I thought, ‘My God, what a way to talk to a Prime Minister.’ But Mr Blair stood there like a puppet on a string while Levy continued his phone call for at least a couple of minutes. Then he turned to the Prime Minister without apology for keeping him waiting and launched into a conversation about the importance of the evening. Here was the leader of your Government being treated like a child. Jane Hogarth, Lord Levy and Tony Blair all acted like this was normal.” (Lord Cashpoint, the bogus count and his porn star wifeThe Daily Mail, 24th March 2007)
But it was normal. Blair knew his place: as gentile frontman for a Judaeocracy, that is, a government funded and controlled by Jews. That’s why, as the Jewish Chronicle has reported, he “was conscious of the need to have very, very good relations” with “the Jewish community.” He knew that if he obeyed orders, he would get to feed first his narcissism in office and then his avarice out of office."

That just blows my mind and maybe puts a question mark over my optimism in the previous post.

Monday, 9 April 2018

Nil desperandum!

It's clear that for whatever reason (fear of White awakening and/or collapse of the financial ponzi?) our globalist overlords are moving in for the kill. Activity on every single battlefront has been ramped up in the War On Whites. Open borders, anti-White affirmative action, 'hate' legislation, anti-White and pro-minority programming in 'entertainment' and media, rewriting of history....the full Orwellian playbook. Of considerable worry is the project to eliminate Bad Thought (i.e. White advocacy) from the internet through an unholy alliance of tech companies, media and traitorous Western governments. This is potentially disastrous as the internet represents easily our most effective communications medium. As always, sometimes behind the curtain, other times in full view, the Tribe has its hands up the asses of their goyim puppets, manipulating them at will. It seems that no matter where we turn our enemies command the reins of power.

But despair not. At least not yet. Because Jews held an almost similar grasp on the commanding heights of society in Weimar Germany. If you're interested in further reading this excellent book provides chapter and verse. Suffice to say that, just like in the West today they dominated politics, banking, media, universities, courts and the medical profession despite comprising little more than 1% of the population..... 'everywhere except agriculture'  as the author notes. 

Their malign impact on popular culture has eerie parallels with today's degenerate West. "The streets are sexually charged, lined with a heady concoction of prostitution, homosexuality, transvestism and drugs. A ferment of artistic and sexual experimentation, the Weimar Republic (1918-1933) privileged an outpouring of cultural creativity in the Bauhaus movement of modern art and the development of the International Style in modern architecture. Against a background of inflation and depression, Berlin drew the talent and energies of the rest of Germany towards its glittering cabaret performances and burgeoning sex tourism industry. From within this hotbed of frenzied immorality, supposedly constitutional sexual equality worked to create the myth of the sexually liberated and financially independent 'New Woman' in Weimar German society. Criminal gangs involved in prostitution, narcotics, gambling, pornography, robbery, and burglary developed and flourished."

Yet within a few years the whole panoply of control had been swept aside with patriotic Germans now in control. Naturally enough this transformation elicited, and does to this day, howls of anguish, much of it focused on how the replacement of Jews (the most talented and industrious of all!) represented an irrecoverable loss for Germany. On the contrary the transformation was accompanied by a (short-lived, admittedly) golden age of economic, cultural and military transformation, all in the face of a ferocious international Jewish boycott.

The lessons being that it is possible to get (((their))) foot off our necks and, far from suffering thereby, Whites will thrive.

Friday, 6 April 2018

The future of American Renaissance

The previous post proposed that a spectrum of opinion in defence of White identity, from the blood and thunder Daily Stormer right over to the tepid and genteel Amren, helps rather than hinders our cause. The Amren case raises a related issue, to what extent - if any - should White identitarians ally with Jews. Amren and Jared Taylor in particular have bent over backwards to accommodate such an alliance. “The role of Jews in a society, the morality of abortion, the influence of Christianity, the appropriate foreign policy, and the place of homosexuals should all be discussed openly in a free society, all in their appropriate places. AR is not that place”.

And that, Jared, is text-book bait and switch. Much like dismissing conspiracy theorists as those who believe 'the earth is flat......and 9/11 was an inside job'. A bit like telling the Titanic story without mentioning that incident with the iceberg.  Because the role of Jews in a society, unlike the other issues he referred to, has been and will be absolutely critical to the success of Amren's objectives. Arguably it's the single most important factor and JT does his cause no service by tiptoeing around this particular elephant. Grovelling before Jewish interests, begging for Jewish Conference speakers (despite often brutal rejection) and banning the likes of David Duke have spectacularly failed so far to generate any payback.

And in my view never will, other than in the form of some short-term tactical alliances. How could anyone think otherwise? Amren's ostensible goal of a White ethnic homeland represents the worst possible nightmare for most Jews. That's why they have been the drivers of the anti-White borders, affirmative action, 'hate' legislation, busing, forced integration and a stream of non-stop anti-White propaganda through media and entertainment for close to a hundred years. And if anything have raised the intensity in recent years.  

I understand that a number of Jews are now working at Amren - which is like allowing the fox into the chicken coop. Because infiltrate and subvert is their standard MO as we've seen with the BBC, National Geographic, Ford Foundation and National Review. These legendary White institutions - and dozens of others like them - have over time been taken over by Jews and weaponised against Whites. Amren would be easy meat by comparison. 

Time will tell

Tuesday, 3 April 2018

The spectrum of White Identitarians

Prof. Kevin McDonald is taking quite a bit of flack - Caroline Yeager has a right go - from many White Identitarians (including several on this forum) for failing to call out the Holocau$t™ in a recent interview. Indeed he could have been stronger on it but the question is should he?  Because had he directly called it out for the hoax it is he'd have been instantly reclassified from a simple anti-Semite to a (shudder) Holocaust denier. This in turn would have been used to further marginalise and discredit his valuable and ground-breaking research on Jews and their calamitous impact on their White hosts. KMcD is an academic and his value to the White cause lies in his academic credibility which remains high despite countless attempts to undermine it. 

Point is when it comes to awakening slumbering Whites it's not always essential to directly identify the JQ. In fact due to more than half a century of relentless brainwashing it can actually be counter-productive. It has to be handled carefully, ideally by way of Whites being induced to discover the truth themselves. Here's what I said in an earlier post about Jordan Peterson. Thanks to JP huge numbers of Whites, especially White men, are being awakened to the war being waged against them. Even though he avoids the JQ (and hey, he's one goy who knows) his material inevitably leads many of his White followers to dig deeper into the existential war being waged against them. That's good enough for me. Remember JP reaches a vast audience, most of whom would never go near the more explicitly Jew-wise sites. At least not before he had ignited their curiosity. What's more he's winning huge numbers of converts to his views on, inter alia, feminism, Cultural Marxism and men's rights. Should he stray off the reservation on the JQ he loses all that and becomes a David Irving, even to the possibility of serving time in the slammer under Canada's Orwellian 'human rights' laws.

We can all help in our own way. Obviously this blog directly addresses the JQ and the Holocau$t™ wheeze, the main effect of which is to guilt-trip Whites into self-destruction. But personally I don't have much to lose being retired, financially comfortable and in a position where all my acquaintances (including a few Jews!) know my views. And this is why I admire those like David Duke, Mark Collett, Greg Johnson and many others who have fearlessly taken on the behemoth from more vulnerable positions. And it's why I don't have much respect for the likes of Jared Taylor who not alone turns away from the JQ but actively misrepresents their destructive and subversive role.

Whites are awakening. The question is whether enough will awaken before we get overtaken by events. Our fight back can take many forms but attacking our own is surely not one of them.

Thursday, 29 March 2018

3D chess? Or checkers?

It's becoming increasingly clear that our faith in Donald Trump was misplaced. I'm one of the holdouts (because it's clear that he knows) but the only consolation from last week's disasters is that the Hildebeaste would have been worse. After all Trump stopped the Joos from getting a majority on the Supreme Court and, for now anyway, pulled out of the Paris Climate Hoax Programme and cancelled the TPP. But that pig's ear of a spending bill he signed last week can never become a silk purse. Money for everything, every imaginable pork project, every failed social programme, billions for Israeli 'security', even $500 million for Planned Parenthood, the privately-owned abortion factory. And a fat pay increase for the Congresscritters.

Money available for everything. Except The Wall. And DACA remains in place for the foreseeable future. That's the DACA he was going to cancel on his first day in office. Reneging on the wall and DACA means (unless we buy into the increasingly improbable 3D chess theory) that the two main planks of his election platform have been abandoned. Another major commitment was to extract America from the foreign war imbroglio. And towards that end he appoints war criminal and Israeli-first cheer-leader John Bolton as his National Security Adviser.

Was he, as many suspected, a fraud from the very beginning, tapping into the zeitgeist to win the biggest prize? Or has he (more likely in my opinion) become hostage to forces so pervasive and powerful that he's simply given in? Who knows what they have on him? Whatever the reason he seems to have abandoned his base, compensating with futile appeals to minorities who'll never ever vote for him.

To offset these disappointing developments I'll leave you with a short entertaining video from the legendary British wild-life broadcaster David Attenborough.

Tuesday, 27 March 2018

Is gravity a social construct?

“It's been described with words like: Signature, Innovative, Contemporary, Iconic, Outstanding, Landmark, Event Venue, Linear Park, and a Place to Linger and Gather. Archetypal design principles of blending shapes, creating shadows, selecting textures, choosing pleasing colors, opening new vistas, using native materials, creating feature lighting and that celebrates and is inspired"

Wow!...what's this, a new Sistine Chapel? Well, not exactly. We're talking about Brutalist Architecture at its most, well, brutal. An over-the-top mass concrete foot bridge weighing nearly 1000 tons. Like something from a post-apocalyptic totalitarian dictatorship you could imagine Harrison Ford pursuing replicants across it in Blade RunnerBrutalist architecture might not be pretty, in fact it's invariably hideously ugly, but at least it works. As in bridges stay up. But, as the top picture shows, this one did not.It lasted a mere seven days.

Which is surprising as the project seemed to have everything going for it. An all-female affirmative action team of  engineers, a  Cuban-American construction firm that had been sued numerous times for unsafe practices and 'well connected' in Miami politics (think Tony Soprano's 'environmental' enterprise) ...what could possibly go wrong? And you'd imagine God would have helped out as it was that unique phenomenon, a moral bridge.  "We're trying to build a bridge, not a wall".  Unfortunately, by collapsiing within a week it became a de facto wall.

You may well ask why the contract was awarded to such a firm. The answer lies in its being a Certified Minority-Owned business, a designation that provides major competitive advantage when tendering.'s another way for White taxpayers to fund their own economic exclusion and dispossession. One Youtube commentator indignantly asked "was the bridge ever stress-tested to see if it could take the weight? Did it go through health and safety checks? This happened in the United States, not some Third World country". But that's the point. Southern Florida is the Third World, a cross between Latin America and Haiti.

Steve Sailer used to have an aphorism regarding the impact of AA and the invasion from the Third World: 'Say goodbye to bridges that don't fall down'.


Sunday, 25 March 2018

Over-confidence or desperation?

Focusing on Britain here but this question could be asked of any White country. Does the increasingly draconian clamp-down on expressions of White identity signify confidence ('let's finish the job') or desperation ('the nativists are restless')? Either interpretation could be applied to recent developments which saw two young foreign visitors arrested, imprisoned for a few nights and then barred from entering the country. The young conservative Canadian Lauren Southern was also barred although spared the indignity of serving time in the slammer. Around the same time a Scotsman was dragged into court and found guilty of a hate crime for training his dog to give a Nazi salute at the 'Seig Heil' command.

Such hyperactive law enforcement was notably absent as Muslim child grooming gangs operated undisturbed across wholes swathes of the country for decades, the police and Government agencies finally forced into action only by the painstaking work of crusading journalist (there are still some left) Andrew Norfolk. When the law enforcement agencies aren't barring and jailing youngsters for hate speech they're also busy on another urgent task: Rehabilitating and integrating blood-crazed "British" head-choppers who've decided to "return home" from Syria. Max Hill QC, the government’s adviser on terrorism legislation has recommended against prosecuting those who fought for ISIS. He said that those who had ‘travelled out of a sense of naivety, possibly with some brainwashing along the way, possibly in their mid-teens and who return in a sense of utter disillusionment’ should be kept out of the court system'.

Set that against a report by the London Times which revealed that agents from “more than 29 forces” arrested more than 3,300 Britons for Internet trolling last year, which marks a rise of almost 50 percent in two years. Almost half of these arrests lead to actual prosecutions. Note that the paper dug up the figures only via Freedom-Of-Information Act requests. 

War has been declared on the British people. The Government (Lib/Lab/Cons absolutely no difference) and its agencies are with the enemy, if not actually the enemy. Why else would they appoint the likes of this clown to head the Crown Prosecution Service and make the likes of these people responsible for the safety of White children? There's a reason for such appointments and British (i.e. White) candidates understand that they either get on message or get nothing. That in turn explains the traitorous behaviour of the police, courts and Government agencies.

I'll leave you with a comment from a Telegraph reader: "We told you this was coming. You called us paranoid conspiracy theorists. Orwell warned us all about it, but we thought 'it could never happen here.' They have taken over. Question is, what are you going to do about it?"


Thursday, 22 March 2018

Generation Z: Heartening developments

 It's clear to me that in terms of defending White interests every generation since WW 2 has been worse than its predecessor. Surely then Generation Z (current secondary/high school cohort) must be the worst yet? Well no actually. Those many of us had dismissed as cucked and pussy-whipped soy-boys are, according to a stunning new research project, more based than I could have believed. As the top chart shows Gen Z Whites boys would have given Trump a virtual clean sweep of the Electoral College had they been allowed to vote. And it's not just the boys. As the lower chart shows White Gen Z students of both sexes overwhelmingly supported Trump in marked contrast to older generations. Another study 'shows that younger generations are turning back towards traditional gender roles after a half century of going in the opposite direction'.

And it's not just in the USA. A UK survey of almost 2,000 adults found that 'on issues like gay marriage, marijuana legalization, transgender rights, and even tattoos, 59% of Gen Z respondents described their views as ‘conservative’ and ‘moderate’. This is a radical change from 83% Millennials and 85% of Gen X who state that their views are ‘quite’ or ‘very liberal’ on those same issues. What’s worrying [my emphasis] is that given their more conservative leanings, Gen Z was not taken into account during this election, even though for many of them it was their first. Younger generations are famous for being liberal, therefore we mistakenly assumed that Gen Z would vote Democratic. But studies show that Gen Z’s views closely resemble those of Libertarian or Moderate Republicans, and that they related with Donald Trump on issues like national security and job creation.'

And get this. The article goes on to lament the reason for this aberrant behaviour: 'One facet would be that from the crib they were plunged into the era on the Internet, being able to research their own opinions on an iPad from the convenience of their couch.'  In other words they formed their own opinions based not on the poz, rather by evaluating a broad spectrum of evidence. Now that must be worrying to our globohomo overlords. 

What's the explanation for this dramatic reversal? At this stage we can only speculate but here's my tuppence worth. For a start they're experiencing diversity up close and personal. Ubiquitous quotas and affirmative action mean that there's no escape. It's one thing to admire and support exotic pets when they actually are exotic. It's quite another thing when you're sharing your life with them. A young girl I know here in Ireland has had it with diversity. Four Africans are literally destroying her education (and that of the whole class) by their loud, aggressive and obnoxious behaviour, ill-discipline and not least, their stupidity. Yet she can see, even at her young age, that teachers and administrators treat the Africans with kid gloves and always shoe-horn into events and photos. Anecdotal I know but I'm 100% certain that were their no Africans in the class the kids would be your typical kumbayaa bleeding hearts. I'm equally certain that their experience is more the norm than the exception.

They must also be increasingly aware, even at a subliminal level, of the multi-faceted war being waged against Whites. Placed at the end of the queue for everything, their culture mocked, their race's achievements denied, their countries swamped by hostile foreigners, strangers in their own lands. And, paradoxically, the explosive growth of identity politics is helping. Every minority, be it race, religion or sexual orientation can rejoice in and ruthlessly promote its own narrow interests. All except straight Whites who must surely find their own sense of identity developing as a result.

Finally, maybe it's just Mother Nature. I picked up this comment somewhere and copied it. 'I find the Whites of generation Z deeply poignant. Here these children are, being subjected to the full force of (((perfected propaganda))) every day of their lives… yet their instincts remain sound. Tribalism kicks in. Their backs are against the wall, they’re facing biological marginalization, dispossession, extinction. They see it and feel it. With these kids we see power of the blood, the power of life, on full display. It’s sadly beautiful.'

Wouldn't it be bizarre if Generation Z, molded by eons of accumulated genetic wisdom, shrugged off the tentacles of the Leviathan and turned out to be the Great White Hope?

Monday, 19 March 2018

Are we sliding towards a third World War?

For quite some time I've been puzzled by what lies behind the hysterical propaganda campaign being waged against Russia by Western governments and their whores in the media. Has there ever been such a preposterous fabrication as that of the dead Russian spy in Britain? (Check The Saker here, hat-tip Franz). I had assumed the hysteria to be relatively harmless, driven by the MIC's need for a Powerful Enemy and Jewish (the Tribe has been all over the campaign) resentment at Russia for foiling their plans in Syria and stamping on the (((oligarchs))). Far from being harmless I now believe we're reprising the years leading up to World War 1 when the nations of the world stumbled helplessly into 'the war to end all wars'.

Of course we now know that their stumble was guided by 'shadowy forces' pulling strings behind the curtain to foment war and use it to extract the Balfour Declaration from Britain. And the very same forces are now at work again, fomenting potentially deadly conflict among White nations. From the Ron Paul Institute (hat-tip Flanders) we learn that 'the largest joint US-Israeli air defense exercise to ever happen' is now taking place in which Israel and the US are jointly simulating a war with Lebanon, Syria, and .... the Gaza strip simultaneously. What makes this last part so concerning are Israel’s recent statements and other preparations for war with all three nations, making “Juniper Cobra” anything but a “routine” drill. It is instead yet another preparation for a massive regional conflict, suggesting that such a conflict could be only a matter of months away'.

And what power is motivated and strong enough to thwart such plans? Why Russia, of course.

American readers will be interested to note that, according to US Third Air Force Commander Lt. General Richard Clarke, their young men may be required to fight and die on Israel's behalf . “We are ready to commit to the defense of Israel and anytime we get involved in a kinetic fight there is always the risk that there will be casualties". And who gets to decide whether these young men will be flung into action against - presumably - the Russians? According to Clark  Haimovitch [the IDF’s Aerial Defense head] would “probably” have the last word. In other words, the IDF will decide whether or not US troops become embroiled in the regional war for which Israel is preparing, not the United States. Indeed  Haimovitch stated that: “I am sure once the order comes we will find here US troops on the ground to be part of our deployment and team to defend the state of Israel.

Yes, you read that right. The Israeli 'defence' forces will decide when to involve the American military in another war of Israel's making.

But such involvement will first require a false flag. And that's being prepared right now. Here's Paul Craig RobertsHow else do we interpret the announcement by General Sergey Rudskoy, chief of the Operational Directorate of the Russian General Staff, that “we have reliable information at our disposal that US instructors have trained a number of militant groups in the vicinity of the town of At-Tanf, to stage provocations involving chemical warfare agents in southern Syria. They are preparing a series of chemical munitions explosions. This fact will be used to blame the government forces. The components to produce chemical munitions have been already delivered to the southern de-escalation zone under the guise of humanitarian convoys of a number of NGOs. The provocations will be used as a pretext by the United States and its allies to launch strikes on military and government infrastructure in Syria.”

Can't you just see it? The solemn warnings from the leaders of the 'Western democracies' that the use of chemical weapons by Assad will be a 'line in the sand' to which NATO will be 'morally obliged' to respond. Everything depends on how much longer Russia will tolerate the goading. Surely it must by now have dawned on Putin and his military leaders that there's no satisfying his - and our - enemies. But if they say 'enough is enough' and directly take on American forces in Syria then God alone knows how it will all end up.

One thing fascinates me about this: What do the likes of Trump, Merkel, Teresa May, Boris Johnson, Macron etc. say to one another in confidence? Do they acknowledge - among themselves - the monstrous lies they're spouting or do their communications reflect what they say in public? 

In any event that's a side issue as the world slides towards war.

Thursday, 15 March 2018

Gun control. Again

I see that there have been mass walkouts from schools throughout America in protest against gun violence. According to Vox the students want to 'deliver a simple message: Reducing gun violence is about more than stopping mass shootings in schools. It’s also about addressing how violence affects communities of color'.  Are we to assume from this that gun violence is ok if the victims are White? In any event they're 'now calling for an end to gun violence through a comprehensive program that addresses youth unemployment, mental health services, and improved school resources'. In other words a few more billions handed over by Whitey to 'community organisers' to.....well, whatever they do I'm sure every last cent will be rigorously accounted for.

So let's take a minute to show that the gun control project is unsupported by either fact or logic and examine why it nonetheless attracts such support from our overlords.


Bad guys can always acquire a gun. Would-be murderers or terrorists can always get hold a gun or if not a weapon equally lethal. This applies especially in the USA where existing circumstances (hundreds of millions of guns in existence and Latin America lying across a porous border) render it impossible to disarm gang-bangers or terrorists.

Bad guys will ignore gun-free zone warnings. In the name of Jesus it should not be necessary to point this out but many otherwise normal people profess to think that sticking up a sign will stop would-be mass murderers. Can you just imagine Nikolas Cruz seeing that sign at the Broward school turning on his heel muttering 'damn it, must find some other kind of weaponry!'. It'd be comical were not lives as stake.

The ownership/murder ratio does not hold up. The ratio of gun ownership does not correlate at all with the ratio of murders. For instance Norway, Canada and Switzerland lag only slightly behind the USA in the gun ownership ratio but the gun death ratio (especially in Norway and Switzerland) is but a fraction of America's. Same within the USA, States and cities with rigid gun control laws have the highest ratios of gun crime.

The 80/20 rule applies: Analysis of race-delineated gun deaths shows that approximately 80% of White killers kill themselves while the ratio is reversed for black killers. 

Gun deaths are actually declining: Despite the opportunistic hysteria that accompanies every mass killing in the USA the number of gun deaths there has actually declined since the nineties. (Last year 12 per 100,000, 15 for most of the nineties...a 20% decline). Now apparently enhanced surgical skills (plenty of practice!) represent an important factor in the reduction. But the fact is that gun deaths are less of a problem now than they were twenty years ago.

Legally-owned gun-holders can deter or foil attacks. Think of the football coach who valiantly threw himself in front of his students when Cruz started firing. What if he had had a powerful gun? We know what would have happened. Cruz would have been offed and the death toll drastically reduced. Note that American politicians strangely enough have no problem with guns when its their own asses being protected. The takeaway: Guns don't murder, the people who use them do. 

The nigger in the woodpile: An appropriate metaphor here because the mystery ingredient underpinning all of the anomalies above is race. As FBI statistics show, year after year, blacks murder at about six times the rate of Whites, Hispanics three to four times the White rate. If you normalise the figures, i.e. isolate the ratio of gun murders committed by Whites, you'll see that America is little different from most European countries. 

It should be clear therefore - even to a sociology professor - that the whole gun control project is based on false assumptions and contradictory data. The measures proposed are heavily skewed to disarm law-abiding Whites while making little or no impact on the overall gun murder rate. So it's totally misdirected and count-productive.

Or is it?

I ask because the gun control project in America is absolutely dominated by Jewish interest groups*. And why would Jews be so hostile to private gun ownership? 
After all, seeing as they portray themselves - ad nauseam - as hapless hard-working victims of pogroms throughout history you'd imagine they'd welcome the chance to arm themselves. In explanation I offer my Iron Law Of White Goyim Shafting. This law states the following: "If organised Jewry is lock-step in unison behind a given measure the ultimate objective of that measure is to shaft the White goyim".

Check it out. Works every time, as consistent as Newton's Law of Gravity or Mendel's Law of Independent Assortment. 

As an explanation for this apparent paradox I offer the experience of colonialism. Understand that every colonial power assigned top priority to disarming the colonised population. The British Empire expended enormous amounts of blood, treasure and a variety of tactics (carrots, sticks, deception) in separating the natives from their arms. Am I uncharitable in suggesting that Jews regard America as colonised territory, a territory in which their position relative to the general population is analogous to that of - for example - Whites in Kenya under colonialism? The nightmare scenario for the settler there was the prospect of being surrounded by well-armed Kikuyu or Masai tribesmen. Which explains why West Bank settlers are armed to the teeth day and night. (A practice with which Feinstein, Schumer, Schiff et al seem to have no difficulty.) So maybe in the fevered imagination of Jewish gun control advocates White Christians represent the natives outside the compound poised to blow them away at the first opportunity.

In that case if you are the Government doesn't it make sense for guns to be controlled by the Government?

* The Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility represents a virtual who's who of leading "American" Jewish organisations supporting gun control including: "The Anti-Defamation League, Bet Alef, Congregation Beth Shalom, Jewish Council for Public Affairs, Jewish Family Service, Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle, Kavana Cooperative, Kol HaNeshamah, National Council of Jewish Women, Stroum Jewish Community Center, Temple Beth Am, Temple Beth Hatfiloh, Temple Beth Or, Temple B’Nai Torah, Temple De Hirsch Sinai, Tikvah Chadashah, Herzl Ner Tamid, Temple Beth El and the Washington State Holocaust Education Resource Center."

Monday, 12 March 2018

Load, aim, shoot self in foot

Uncle Nasty, a venerable commentator on this site, has frequently claimed that Jews aren't all that clever, that they're invariably the architects of their own downfall through behaviour which they cannot control. Sustenance to this claim is lent by the furore that's broken out over the subject of 'globalists'. First we had Trump spelling out that "we will no longer surrender this country, or its people, to the false song of globalism." And who could argue about that? After all globalism has become increasingly loathed, especially in White countries. Then he ostensibly complimented outgoing Director of the National Economic Council, (((Gary Cohn))) by observing that “he may be a globalist but I still like him.” Adding "and he's loyal to our country".

Innocuous? Well I don't think so and neither did organised Jewry who erupted in an orchestrated frenzy at what was apparently 'an anti-Semitic dog-whistle'. Why? Maybe they remembered when Trump earlier referred to “the global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth.”  Be that as it may the Jewish reaction, by condemning criticism of globalism as anti-Semitism, in effect conceded they are in fact globalists, thereby conforming the rootless disloyal International Jew stereotype.

Which surely represents a huge mistake, as the brilliant Ann Coulter's ensuing Twitter storm underlined. Her readers did not hold back, lashing in to the (((globalists))) with reckless abandon. Such a reaction would have been inconceivable even a few years ago. Same thing with Hungary's rejection of George Soros. The Government billboards were careful to avoid any overt reference to his Jewishness, instead calling him out as a parasitic international financier with no loyalty to his country. The sensible Jewish reaction would have been silence. Instead we got another chorus of oy veys at this blatant 'anti-Semitism'. 

Two Jewish authors in the London Independent wrote that 'across Hungary, one could see huge electric blue posters of George Soros as a puppet master pulling the strings of opposition politicians, or devilishly laughing at the prospect of a “plan” to undermine what Prime Minister Viktor Orban calls, Europe’s “ethnic homogeneity”. As a result 'we Hungarian Jews are justified in fearing for our security'. Seriously, how stupid is that? You associate yourself with one of the planet's most loathed people and the equally loathed projects he endows. Attack him and you attack all Jews. 

Part of the explanation in my view lies in the spectacular inability of Jews to accept blame for anything. Nothing is their fault and if others attack them it's because of their inherent evil or irrationality and nothing to do with Jewish behaviour. I've seen this right down to the level of individuals that I've known for a long time. It truly is amazing.So right now they've identified themselves with hated people and ideologies and react by smearing and silencing the opponents of those ideologies. Which probably explains 
the mental images I have of the little boy with his finger in the dam.

Saturday, 10 March 2018

With enemies like this....

My second last post was block-pilled and pessimistic and for rational reasons. But there are times when the actions of our enemies give me hope. Her I refer to those who want to destroy people of European heritage by way of  feminism and social atomisation (hence population decline), miscegenation or where possible by direct physical means as in South Africa. And we are right to be worried in that they control the commanding heights of our societies, the money, media, entertainment, education and the think thanks. 

But this full-spectrum dominance also represents a weakness in that in breeds over-confidence and obscures what ordinary people (those targeted for elimination) are thinking and feeling. I.e. on-the-ground reality. Take this piece written for Fox News by one Rabbi Abraham Cooper as an example: "Extremists in the Alt-Right movement reject the rules laid out by social media companies and others to curb online hate.  The U.S.-based extremists are recasting neo-Nazism, xenophobia, Anti-Semitism and white supremacism with a new vocabulary (e.g. “It’s OK to Be White,” “Stop White Genocide”). An entire subculture of hate is taking shape online ranging from Pepe the Frog’s icon to gaming apps to t-shirts—all using insiders’ vocabulary."

How tone-deaf, how lacking in empathy can you get? Because something deep within even the most cucked, comatose White will be aroused by a Jew claiming that "It’s OK to Be White”  and “Stop White Genocide” represent a 'sub-culture of hate'.  The reader comments surviving the censors' beady eye (remember this is Fox News, where grovelling to the Tribe is mandatory) bear this out. "Your media, Hollywood, banking system, corporate and government control, and education system absolutely hammers us for the last 25 years, and we cannot meekly say “it’s okay to be white”?" was not an untypical response.

The rabbi's solution?  'We must use every tool in our own powerful arsenal to reach digital-savvy teens and young adults with compelling messages of inclusion, compassion and love. Yeah, sure, rabbi, I can so feeeeel your love for us. And who exactly are 'we', rabbi? You remind me of Obama hectoring Americans with 'that's not who we are'. And for once he was telling the truth. Because Americans are not half-breed Kenyan homosexuals. Neither are they a tiny hostile 'elite' bent on their own destruction.

And destroyed we might be in due course. Then again your arrogance, solipsism and lack of empathy remind me of the frozen leaders of the Soviet Union waving from atop Lenin's tomb, blissfully unaware that with a few years the world as they knew it would collapse around them.

Monday, 5 March 2018

Trouble in diversityland as nation-wreckers fall out

Reading a warning by BBC Director-General Lord Hall in yesterday's Sunday Times I immediately checked the weather report for signs of frost in Hell. You see  the top dog in the organisation that has done more than any other to destroy traditional Britain was complaining about......organisations damaging traditional Britain! Hall claims that technology giants like Google, Twitter and FB are stoking social unease and division and - get this - fears that 'our sense of national identity and our sense of who we are might be threatened'!!

In other news George Soros thinks there's too much money in politics, Casey Anthony criticises the standard of creche facilities while Madonna laments the sluttishness of today's young singers. 

This guy is an embarrassment to even the most odious Cultural-Marxist parasite at the BBC (more accurately the HebeBC), the most trusted name in Fake News. Since its takeover by anti-British subversives it has waged an unrelenting war against the British people, against family, against community, against tradition, against culture, against Christianity, against history, against ethics, against classical beauty, against reason, against nature itself all the while enabling an army of Third World parasites to pillage an inheritance to which they are not entitled.  

It embodies what Hannah Arendt called "the totalitarian contempt for facts and reality." Its presenters are anything other than straight white males (the people who made the BBC the broadcasting gold standard) and are skilled in the delicate art of not seeing what's in front of their hooked noses.... and not much else. Inevitably broadcasting standards have plummeted. The Hebe has instead become the by-word for trendy, faux working-class values peddled by privileged Cultural-Marxists, a hostile license-payer funded globohomo 'elite' of rootless cosmopiltans......unelected, unaccountable, completely alien to the nation they purport to represent and whose job is to repackage inconvenient facts into support of the Official Story. Having built a giant cocoon of lies they smear and stigmatise as racist, homophobic or anti-Semitic anyone contradicting what George Orwell called their "smelly little orthodoxies" while defending to the last degenerate perverts like Jimmy Saville.

So how about this for an updated HebeBC Mission Statement?: "T
o cleanse Britain of its traditional people and replace them with a slurry of deracinated dumbed-down ant people." Has a nice ring to it, doesn't it?

And its new Message To The British People: “Stop thinking and talking about the dispossession of your countries and the destruction of your societies. Why not enjoy Danny Cohen's Snog, Marry, Avoid and Hotter Than My Daughter? Or maybe watch this disabled black Muslim tell you how Islam invented everything. Isn’t that much better than worrying about the state of your society?”

Just to cover the remote possibility that Hall isn't lying let me spell it out for him. If the people change, so does the nation, into a reflection of the ones the invaders escaped from. 
If my word isn't good enough Plato's might be: "This City is what it is because our citizens are what they are."  Which is why an all-British Cotswold village is idyllic and Tower Hamlets is a crime-infested, poverty-stricken, welfare-dependent hell-hole just waiting to explode into inter-community violence. Not that that will bother this particular shitlib, living as he does far from the vibrancy he helped foist on the country.

But he does recognise that the HebeBC faces what's potentially an existential crisis. The gods of karmic retribution will be pleased with this, as will I. I want to see this rotting corpse of vice and depravity on its collectivist gobohomo back, twitching like a dying roach or a slug rolling around in a bowl of salt. 

Dear Lord, let the suffering begin.

Thursday, 1 March 2018

Where are my black pills?

Have you ever - in a comprehensive way - tried to think through to where Whites and our attendant culture will be by say 2050? I mean methodically think it through rather than reacting to specific developments by loosely prognosticating over an indeterminate time-frame. Having taken time out to do this over the last few days I reluctantly feel like reaching for my black ('we're doomed') pills. 

Here's my analysis.

First consider the societal and demographic change that has overwhelmed the West during the last fifty years or so. Not an exaggeration to say that everything deemed back then as good, admirable, worthwhile, moral and beautiful has been turned on its head, reversed 180 degrees. It's unprecedented. Over the same time our countries have been over-run by ungrateful Third World parasites who get favoured over Whites, especially White males, in employment, college admissions, the law and in their depiction in the media. Nobody back then would have considered today's society as remotely possible, only as a sick joke. Yet it's here. (As if to underline my point Ireland's gay, Hindu Pakistani leader has just come on Lady Savant's TV Screen).

And here's the thing. This anti-White revolution succeeded without, metaphorically, a shot having been fired in response (apart from the very early years). Whites stood back and allowed their institutions, culture, history, religion, heroes and flags be traduced, mocked and marginalised. In response to the physical takeover of their ancestral lands they just retreated, street-by-street, neighbourhood-by-neighbourhood, town-by-town, city-by-city. Retreat, withdraw. Uncomplaining, steeped in apathy and nihilism. Worse, most seem oblivious to what's really going on as they pay big money to cheer the black sports mercenaries purporting to represent them. Meanwhile the Muslim grooming gangs are back on the streets of Rotherham, mocking the inability of the impotent kuffars to protect their children.

Now look at the demographic dimension and in particular the fact that it changes in geometric rather than linear terms. I point out to people in my town of 10,000 that releasing 100 breeding pairs of blacks and/or Muslims (whelping five kids per pair while natives reproduce at barely replacement levels) means that in less than three generations we natives become a minority. While demographic projections are not exact science the implications are nonetheless horrifying especially when projected to national level.

The United States is the canary in the coal mine in that Whites will become a minority there within a generation if present trends continue. When that happens White governance constraints will be abandoned while a motley collection of blacks, dual-citizen Israelis, Hispanics and various forms of mystery meat will control politics and the courts. Even now the Third World tribal influence can be discerned in financial profligacy, blatant and unapologetic ignoring of Constitutional constraints, a lack of criminal accountability for the powerful, waging undeclared wars, gross nepotism, plummeting educational standards, heavy censorship and media as mouthpiece for the Permanent Government. In other words......Brazil

Whites will of course survive in Brasil del Norte. And most will prosper in relative terms as Whites always do. But it will no longer be their country. And the minorities will never let them forget that fact. And what of the rest of the (rapidly diminishing) White world? Well undoubtedly, despite having done nothing up to now, we'll push-back against the black/brown invasion, like what we now see among the heroic Visigrad countries. But I don't expect a militant reaction from Whites (analogies to the Soviet Union aside) as long as they have enough money to get along and above all retain access to the Electronic Jew (TV). And given the productivity gains stemming from robotics and AI I don't expect the supply of cheap/free stuff to be reduced anytime soon. Meanwhile the demographic virus will continue its work, steadily and silently eroding White majorities everywhere apart from eastern Europe. 

Gloomy I know but we still must keep fighting the good fight, taking inspiration from the words of Samuel Adams.  "It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”

Bear in mind that this was the way our enemies took over and destroyed our societies. Wouldn't it be lovely if we could turn their weapons back against them?

Monday, 26 February 2018

Victim wars

Regular readers of this blog will know that, paradoxical as it seems, I welcome the growth of identity politics. Yes, as of now White males are the only ones denied a place in the Victimhood Hierarchy, being as we are oppressors, and suffering as a result. But the more marginalised White men become the more they recognise the inherent unfairness and this in turn will surely foster a sense of their own identity. In addition, given that we're in the 'terror and virtue' phase of the revolution the various victim identities will inevitably turn on one another, strutting like peacocks across the moral high ground even though they're really just squabbling over the spoils.

No surprise then that the British Labour Party provides an incubator for the different flavors of the mentally insane to turn on each other. It started with the plan to impose 50 all-wimminz short-lists for parliamentary seats. But then women with big swinging dicks, in other words 
mentally ill men in dresses, decided to muscle in, demanding their share of the wimminz' seats. Cue a massive war of words, lawsuits, the doxing  of opponents, threats of physical violence and finally the arrival of the police, sirens blaring.

Manjawed bullheaded extreme-left warpigs like Emma Salmon suddenly found themselves outflanked on the left by the transgenders, who accused her - wait for it - of being a Nazi no less. For someone who had built a career out of tarnishing opponents with same smear this must have come as a hell of a shock. Her liturgy of denunciation has been expropriated by the trannies and turned against her. Apparently 'women of colour' and Muslims have now discerned that they're under-represented as well and are waging their own war for more seats.

As if this wasn't enough the crime of ageism was added to the mix. Legendary second wave feminists Germain Greer and Margaret Atwood were deemed to be 'dinosaurs', to have 'lost their marbles' and were instructed to 'listen, learn....and step aside'. One 'journalist' dismissed Greer by suggesting that 'nobody under the age of 45 has heard of her' and as 'a burgundy-lipstick, bad highlights, second-wave feminist has-been. She DISGUSTS me!'. 

Oh dear.  

Like Hitler and Stalin the various identities can declare non-aggression pacts but sooner or later war will break out. We're seeing the beginning of it now. On which point I notice that Diane Feinstein has failed to get the Democratic nomination in Mexico Norde California for another run at the Senate. No surprise that it's gone instead to a Latino. So suck it up, bitch, your pet nation-wreckers have turned on you because Latinos, blacks and Asians are immune to Holocau$t™ sob-stories. They'll support their own. 

It's my hope and belief that in due course White males will start doing the same.

Friday, 23 February 2018

The Florida school shooting

While there have been questions and inconsistencies raised about America's school shootings I never went along with the idea that they were hoaxes. For the simple reason that in a First World country you just cannot magic away bodies or avoid coronary inspections. Having said that some aspects of the recent events in Florida are extraordinary.

For a start the shooter was on everybody's radar for months, issuing explicit threats yet nobody did anything to stop him. The school had held a 'shooter on the premises' drill that very morning (statistically stratospeherically unlikely) and it seems everybody in a position of influence in the affair is Jewish  - Sheriff, Circuit Court Chief Judge, State Attorney, Chair of  the School Board, Chief Counsel for the School Board, Mayor and Deputy Mayor and probably a lot more. 

And just as with Sandy Hook the reaction of parents and students bordered on sperg-like. Look at that beaming father who had just lost his daughter talking to little Marco Rubio and the 'grieving' students in the lower pic who virtually trampled over their dead colleagues to film selfies. There's something fundamental and deeply disturbing going on here.
And then the MSM and other nation-wreckers pile in in lock-step to use the occasion as another opportunity to disarm American citizens in what is clearly a methodical co-ordinated project. Even though the Constitution couldn't be clearer:  "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." But then who worries about the Constitution since 9/11?

The gun control agenda is based on a farrago of falsehoods and faulty analysis. For a start anyone who wants to get a gun can get a gun, legally or illegally.   Even under the strict laws here in Ireland I know that a friend of a friend of a friend would be able to get me one, and a powerful one at that. Under open borders proposed by the gun control lobby whatever flimsy obstacles apply now would disappear. The reality is that stricter gun laws would overwhelmingly affect law-abiding Whites. Which - it's not unreasonable to assume - is the whole  purpose. Let us also note that according to Ann Coulter's research the vast majority of mass shootings have taken place in (cough) 'gun-free zones' (and states with strict gun laws) and almost half have been committed by recent immigrants. In the fevered minds of the gun control lobby an intending mass murderer would presumably observe the NO GUNS ALLOWED sign and immediately cancel his assault.

Now think of the football coach who valiantly threw himself in front of his students when Cruz started firing. What if he had had a powerful gun? We know what would have happened. Cruz would have been offed and the death toll drastically reduced. And that's the central point: Guns don't murder, the people who use them do. And that's what is so disgusting about CNN and all the others jumping on this particular bandwagon. They don't give a damn about the victims, all they care about is their agenda to disarm law-abiding Whites.

I hope that Americans, real Americans, stand firm against the onslaught.

Monday, 19 February 2018

A Wakanda wild side

Have you ever seen anything like the carefully-orchestrated hype surrounding Black PantherThe uniformity and obsequiousness of the reaction would have made Stalin blush, making Pravda's responses to his speeches forensically hostile by comparison.  It is of course all part of the Magic Numinous Negro Project, the objective of which is to make blacks seem like the best breeding material for shiksas and ultimately blend Whites out of existence. 

But what really blows my mind is the reaction of African-Americans. They, in some unfathomable dimension, seem to think Wakanda is real and take immense pride in it. I kid you not. The following are from a representative sample of journalists and 'academics'.

"An Afro-futuristic reality an idyllic, technically advanced and regally organized African society."

"This is a society that remains perfect because it has wisely been kept secret from the greed and cruelty of the “colonizers,” as the Wakandans call the people of the West."

"Meanwhile in Shuri, we see the infinite possibilities of our girls, who can be, do and invent anything when given the tools, the technological playground and the access to black girl joy."

"And so I drank up Wakanda like a tall, cool drink. And I felt proud."

Sweet Jesus, they can't really think it's real, can they? If so they perfectly meet the clinical definition of psychotic. The irony is that Wakanda itself is the creation of writers, designers, digital artists, software developers and special effects professionals of whom probably 90% are White, the remainder Asians. Any blacks involved would just have brought the coffee. 

Apart from black pride the project has greatly enhanced black cohesiveness and sense of identity. I gather that black-only screenings are taking place all over America and Whites feel frozen out in mixed-race audiences. Identity politics on steroids. And that's good. Identity politics is good for Whites even though - in fact because - right now we're the only race that doesn't self-identify. But that's changing as we get marginalised, mocked, devalued, discriminated against and programmed into believing that inferior races are our our own countries, the ones carved out by our ancestors for us, their descendants. 

A closing thought. Maybe there is a Wakanda after all. Built by blacks, never colonised and ruled by these ingenious Africans since its foundations hundreds of years ago. Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the First Wakanda.

Addendum: I have done a comprehensive analysis of the IMDB database of reviews by ordinary film-goers. With a few exceptions these have been tepid at best, downright negative at worst. What's more many White viewers saw through the film's blatant racial theme, the Stalinist uniformity of the 'professional' reviewers, and that as such it's part of a wider anti-White programme. (((They))) have unwittingly further undermined the dwindling credibility of mainstream 'news' sources.